home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, JUNE 19, 1995
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 93-676 CARPENTER, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for
-
- further consideration in light of Ryder v. United
-
- States, 515 U. S. (1995).
-
- 93-966 CLARK, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for
-
- further consideration in light of Ryder v. United
-
- States, 515 U. S. (1995).
-
- 94-48 KING FISHER MARINE SERVICE V. PEREZ, ROGELIO, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Gutierrez de Martinez
-
- v. Lamagno, 515 U. S. (1995).
-
- 94-434 MISSOURI, ET AL. V. JENKINS, KALIMA, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of Missouri v.
-
- Jenkins, 515 U. S. ------ (1995).
-
- 94-886 JACKSON, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. WASH. CULINARY SCH., ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of
-
- Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of
-
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Company, 515 U. S. (1995).
-
- 94-944 CIR V. SCHMITZ, JOHN, ET UX.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Commissioner of
-
- Internal Revenue v. Schleier, 515 U. S. (1995).
-
- 94-1045 DIR., OWCP, DEPT. OF LABOR V. RAMBO, JOHN, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Metropolitan Stevedore
-
- Company v. Rambo, 515 U. S. (1995).
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- No. HELEN FONVILLE BESS V. HENRY CISNEROS, SECRETARY OF
- HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time
-
- is denied.
-
-
- D-1485 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD MARK JACOBS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Richard
-
- Mark Jacobs, of Little Rock, Arkansas, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Missouri and this Court by order of December 12,
-
- 1994, having suspended the said Richard Mark Jacobs from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Richard Mark Jacobs be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1527 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WALTER EUGENE HERKENHOFF
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Walter
-
- Eugene Herkenhoff, of Las Cruces, New Mexico, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of New Mexico and this Court by order of April 17, 1995,
-
- having suspended the said Walter Eugene Herkenhoff from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Walter Eugene
-
- Herkenhoff be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of
-
- attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1529 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER B. SPIVAK
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Peter B.
-
- Spivak, of Detroit, Michigan, has been suspended from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Michigan and
-
- this Court by order of April 17, 1995, having suspended
-
- the said Peter B. Spivak from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him
-
- to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Peter B. Spivak be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1536 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANLEY R. STERN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Stanley
-
- R. Stern, of New York, New York, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of April 17, 1995, having suspended the
-
- said Stanley R. Stern from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Stanley R. Stern be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1538 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JENNY M. MAIOLO
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jenny M.
-
- Maiolo, of Richmond Hill, New York, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Dept., and
-
- this Court by order of April 17, 1995, having suspended
-
- the said Jenny M. Maiolo from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring her
-
- to show cause why she should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jenny M. Maiolo be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1541 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN R. BELL
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Alan R.
-
- Bell, of Fort Lee, New Jersey, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
-
- and this Court by order of April 24, 1995, having
-
- suspended the said Alan R. Bell from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring
-
- him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Alan R. Bell be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1543 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES K. YOUNG
-
- It having been reported to the Court that James K.
-
- Young, of Bloomingdale, Illinois, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
-
- Illinois and this Court by order of April 24, 1995,
-
- having suspended the said James K. Young from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said James K. Young be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1545 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DOMINIC JOSEPH POTTS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Dominic
-
- Joseph Potts, of Steubenville, Ohio, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Ohio and
-
- this Court by order of May 15, 1995, having suspended
-
- the said Dominic Joseph Potts from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring
-
- him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Dominic Joseph Potts be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1558 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MORTON CHARLES ROSENGARDEN
-
- It is ordered that Morton Charles Rosengarden, of
-
- Deerfield, Illinois, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1559 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TED HENRY CREWELL
-
- It is ordered that Ted Henry Crewell, of Dallas,
-
- Texas, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1560 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD VINCENT WASHINGTON, JR
-
- It is ordered that Edward Vincent Washington, Jr.,
-
- of Montclair, California, be suspended from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- 94-8951 WILKINSON, VERNON C. V. MISSOURI
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- July 10, 1995, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 94-1592 BHD. LOCOMOTIVE, ETC., ET AL V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- 94-1809 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC, ET AL. V. EPSTEIN, LAWRENCE, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Business Roundtable for leave to file
-
- a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
-
- writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1
-
- presented by the petition.
-
- 94-9088 NEAL, MEIRL G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 94-693 HERNANDEZ, RAY V. TX ST. BD. DENTAL, ET AL.
-
- 94-999 DOWNEY, BURNS, ET UX. V. CIR
-
- 94-1041 HAWKINS, JACK, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1339 MALTBY, KERRY V. WINSTON, MARY, ET AL.
-
- 94-1407 PENNSYLVANIA V. BULL, RONALD
-
- 94-1417 WOODALL, JOYCE V. RENO, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.
-
- 94-1482 CLOUSER, LEROY, ET AL. V. GLICKMAN, SEC. OF AG., ET AL.
-
- 94-1533 FLOYD, DEBORAH V. COLLIN COM. COLLEGE, ET AL.
-
- 94-1541 BEY, JOHN, ET AL. V. BISBEE, KENNETH
-
- 94-1558 EEOC V. FRANCIS W. PARKER SCHOOL
-
- 94-1579 COLLINS, CHARLES V. DUGGAN, W. DENNIS
-
- 94-1581 REGIONS BANK, ETC. ET AL. V. IRS
-
- 94-1605 MITCHELL, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1611 HAITIAN REFUGEE CENTER V. CHRISTOPHER, SEC. OF STATE
-
- 94-1668 RAHN, ROSEMARY V. DRAKE CENTER, INC.
-
-
- 94-1709 THOMAS, TYRONE V. BAXTER, MARIE
-
- 94-1717 GREER, MARIAN, ET UX. V. LANDMARK BANCSHARES, ET AL.
-
- 94-1725 CRANE CO. V. U.S. EX REL. RABUSHKA, ET AL.
-
- 94-1729 O'QUINN, JOHN V. KLINE, DONNA
-
- 94-1731 ROWLAND, GOV. OF CT, ET AL. V. JUAN F., ET AL.
-
- 94-1736 TODD, JASON, ET AL. V. FLORIDA
-
- 94-1737 K. R. B. vs. STEPHENSON, JAY, ET AL.
-
- 94-1739 NATL. PAINT & COATING, ET AL V. CHICAGO, IL
-
- 94-1742 OSBORNE, JENNINGS, ET UX. V. POWER, ARLETA, ET AL.
-
- 94-1751 WILLIAMS, JESSIE V. CAPPS TRAILER SALES, ET AL.
-
- 94-1752 GARRETT, SHEILA, ET AL. V. GILLESS, A. C., ET AL.
-
- 94-1755 KOUPAL, BRETT V. SIOUX FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
-
- 94-1757 KLEENWELL BIOHAZARD, ETC. V. NELSON, SHARON, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 94-1759 ELLINGTON, JOY, ET AL. V. LA CTY. SUPERIOR CT., ET AL.
-
- 94-1762 MORETTI, SALVATORE V. DINICE, LOUIS, ET AL.
-
- 94-1765 INN OF MIAMI AIRPORT, INC. V. PERREN-VIBES MUSIC, ET AL.
-
- 94-1766 MICHIGAN V. HENSICK, TIMOTHY LEE
-
- 94-1767 SULLIVAN, JOHN, ET UX. V. MEMPHIS, TN
-
- 94-1768 CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORP. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1769 MURPHY, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1774 LESLIE, ROBERT V. LONG BEACH PROSECUTOR, ET AL.
-
- 94-1775 CAVER, HELEN V. GERACE, JOE, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 94-1777 BALL, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. GASHO, JOHN, ET UX.
-
- 94-1781 ATTORNEY R. V. MISSISSIPPI BAR
-
- 94-1782 WISTON XXIV LTD. PARTNERSHIP V. BALCOR PENSION INVESTORS V
-
- 94-1783 SCARIANO, ANTHONY V. JUSTICES, SUPREME CT OF IN
-
- 94-1784 AMATO, ROBERT V. LA COMMR. SECURITIES, ET AL.
-
- 94-1792 UNIFIED SCH. DIST. # 244 V. KANSAS, ET AL.
-
- 94-1794 DAVIS, DIANA, ETC., ET AL V. FICANO, ROBERT, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 94-1795 YARDARM RESTAURANT, INC. V. POMPANO BEACH, FL
-
- 94-1798 HOME OF FAITH, ETC., ET AL. V. CIR
-
- 94-1805 NEW ORLEANS, LA, ET AL. V. LA DEBATING, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 94-1814 BURNS, CATHY V. REED, RICK
-
- 94-1834 ALPER, HARVEY, ET AL. V. FLORIDA BAR
-
- 94-1852 ALLEY, DOYLE V. GE CAPITAL CORP.
-
- 94-1899 PEREZ-AGUILERA, ERASMO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-6703 KIMBRO, MARILYN A. V. VELTEN, DOLORES, ET AL.
-
- 94-7239 HENDERSON, ANDRE T. V. BAIRD, DAVID, ET AL.
-
- 94-7412 MODDON, WILLIE M. V. TEXAS
-
- 94-8010 BROXTON, EUGENE ALVIN V. TEXAS
-
- 94-8131 LEDBETTER, RUSSELL V. EDWARDS, WARDEN
-
- 94-8179 GILLESPIE, DARRYL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-8507 ) OUTTEN, JACK FOSTER V. DELAWARE
- )
- 94-8512 ) SHELTON, STEVEN V. DELAWARE
-
- 94-8566 WILLIS, KATHY E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-8853 QUESINBERRY, GEORGE ADRIAN V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC
-
- 94-8888 SCOTT, PAUL WILLIAM V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL
-
- 94-8935 CARRILLO, EDUARDO, ET AL. V. ILLINOIS
-
- 94-8939 JEROME, JOSEPH A. V. BIDDERS INC.
-
- 94-8941 ALEXANDER, ELIJAH ALFRED V. JOHNSON, JOSEPH, ET AL.
-
- 94-8948 ORIAKHI, FELIX V. WEST, BRYANT, ET AL.
-
- 94-8953 WOODALL, J. C. vs. HILL, SHERIFF, ET AL.
-
- 94-8954 VOHRA, DEEPAK V. CA WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD
-
- 94-8958 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. INTERPOL, ET AL.
-
- 94-8959 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INT'L.
-
- 94-8962 STUART, CLYDE WAYNE V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 94-8964 PAGE, TERRY O'CONNOR V. ANGELONE, VA DOC
-
- 94-8968 WEINSTEIN, BARRY V. WEINSTEIN, GAIL E.
-
- 94-8970 CALHOUN, ROBERT H. S. V. WASHINGTON
-
- 94-8971 HOMO, LAWRENCE R. V. HENNIKER
-
- 94-8973 CAO, THINH VAN V. MASSACHUSETTS
-
- 94-8975 PIETRI, NORBERTO V. FLORIDA
-
- 94-8978 WOOD, JOSEPH R. V. ARIZONA
-
- 94-8986 ROGERS, KENNETH V. CUYSON, NENITA, ET AL.
-
- 94-8987 SMITH, RODNEY WAYNE V. CARROLL, THOMAS, ET AL.
-
- 94-8991 MINCEY, MITCHELL T. V. THOMAS, WARDEN
-
- 94-8992 JONES, HARRY V. FLORIDA
-
- 94-8993 NOEL, DEFRANTZE L. V. WHITE, STEVE, ET AL.
-
- 94-8994 MELINIE, VAN V. CAIN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-8995 BREWER, WILLIE LEE V. VOINOVICH, GOV. OF OH, ET AL.
-
- 94-8998 VIGES, JOHN L. V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 94-8999 BRIGAERTS, R. G. vs. GOMEZ, DIR., CA DOC, ET AL.
-
- 94-9003 WILSON, LORENZO M. V. CIRCUIT COURT OF AL
-
- 94-9016 McDONALD, MAURICE J. V. LUCHIRINI, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 94-9024 GERMANY, DENNIS C. V. ZAVARAS, EXEC. DIR., CO DOC
-
- 94-9027 DE LA ROSA, JOSE V. SCULLY, SUPT., GREEN HAVEN
-
- 94-9028 HERBST, COLIN J. V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 94-9029 CLARK, A. D. vs. O'SULLIVAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-9030 ARNOLD, KEITHIAN L. V. BOATMEN'S TRUST COMPANY
-
- 94-9031 BETHEA, ANTHONY CRAIG V. ABRAMAJTYS, WARDEN
-
- 94-9049 FONTAN, CHARLES V. IEYOUB, ATTY. GEN. LA
-
- 94-9052 FOTTLER, FRED L. V. AINSWORTH, GARY L., ET AL.
-
- 94-9053 HABURN, JAMES D., ET AL. V. USDC ED NC
-
- 94-9063 MORGAN, WALTER D. V. MacDONALD, F. T., ET AL.
-
- 94-9075 SPENCER, EUGENE V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 94-9113 HENRY, JOHN R. V. FLORIDA
-
- 94-9136 BOYDEN, GERALD GLEN V. RUBIN, BARRY, ET AL.
-
- 94-9147 ROMERO, MICHAEL V. TANSY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 94-9179 RATTLER, CLYDE V. OPM
-
- 94-9190 FREEMAN, FRED H. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 94-9192 GREEN, DAVID L. V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 94-9194 HARBIN, ROBERT W. V. MD MOTOR VEHICLE ADMIN.
-
- 94-9196 GALVAN, CINDY L. V. CAROTHERS, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- 94-9202 BURNS, DEBORAH B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9208 BATTIE, FRED V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9226 SARGENT, WAYNE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9235 MARK, GLEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9236 ROSARIO, GREGORIO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9241 SPENCER, DARRELL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9244 CHRISTIE, CLIFFORD DENNIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9248 JAMERSON, RONNIE N. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9249 JONES, ELLIS L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9251 SABINI, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9252 SEGUAME, ESTEVAN CARRERA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9254 ROBINSON, ANTHONY TODD V. SCOTT., DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 94-9256 WEXLER, HAROLD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9259 WALKER, REGINALD K. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9260 WILLIAMSON, CALISE D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9262 MURPHY, MARIO B. V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC
-
- 94-9267 CARROLL, EDWARD P., ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9268 ARROYO-ANGULO, CLIMACO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9271 LUCAS, JOHN V. SWINSON, WARDEN
-
- 94-9273 LOCKETT, CARL D. V. MISSISSIPPI
-
- 94-9274 LOCKETT, CARL D. V. MISSISSIPPI
-
- 94-9280 ) MORRIS, WILLIE V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 94-9321 ) MALONE, CHARLES B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9283 SMITH, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9284 CHRISTOPHER, HERBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9286 GARCIA-RICO, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9295 FORD, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9297 MILLER, STEPHEN S. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9308 WASHINGTON, JEROME V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9309 VAZQUEZ, DEBBIE L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9311 BRIGHT, DAVID MILES V. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORR.
-
- 94-9312 FRIEDMAN, LEONARD R. V. BD. OF REG. IN MEDICINE
-
- 94-9316 REAVIS, SANDRA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9319 SCOTT, WAYNE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9320 McCULLOUGH, TONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9325 WEBSTER, JEFFREY S. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9326 DANIELS, STEVE A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9336 MORENO-HERNANDEZ, MARIO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9343 GUTIERREZ, JOSE G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9345 NIDIFFER, WILLIAM E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9346 McCLINTON, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9348 WALDEMER, MARK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9354 ADDISON, CURTIS A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9355 AFLLEJE-TORRES, BARBARA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9369 BASDEN, ERNEST W. V. NORTH CAROLINA
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 94-1612 MICHIGAN V. BELLEW, RODNEY
-
- 94-1786 NEW YORK V. REYES, CARMEN
-
- The motions of respondents for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis are granted. The petitions for writs of
-
- certiorari are denied.
-
- 94-1644 ) DOE, JOHN, ET UX. V. KIRCHNER, OTAKAR
- )
- 94-9087 ) BABY RICHARD V. KIRCHNER, OTAKAR, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Yale University Child Study Center,
-
- et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is
-
- granted. The motion of Governor of the State of
-
- Illinois for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
-
- granted. The motion of Paul Simon, et al. for leave to
-
- file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of
-
- Catholic Adoptive Parents Association for leave to file
-
- a brief as amicus curiae in No. 94-9087 is granted. The
-
- petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
-
-
- 94-1695 CARRIERE, MANSEL, ET AL. V. GREY WOLF DRILLING, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
- 94-1705 BEADLE, ASTON V. TAMPA, FL, ET AL.
-
- The motion of National Jewish Commission on Law and
-
- Public Affairs, et al. for leave to file a brief as
-
- amici curiae is granted. The motion of General
-
- Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, et al. for leave
-
- to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion
-
- of Advocates International for leave to file a brief as
-
- amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Agudath Israel
-
- of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
-
- granted. The motion of American Jewish Congress, et al.
-
- for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 94-1719 MountainWEST FIN. V. VISA U.S.A., INC.
-
- The motion of American Council on Consumer
-
- Awareness, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici
-
- curiae is granted. The motion of American Financial
-
- Services Association for leave to file a brief as amicus
-
- curiae is granted. The motion of Center for Public
-
- Interest Research, et al. for leave to file a brief as
-
- amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
-
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
- 94-8667 IN RE DALE SMITH
-
- The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
-
-
-
- PROHIBITION DENIED
-
- 94-8945 IN RE THOMAS SPYCHALA
-
- The petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 94-1413 BAKER, REBECCA, ET AL. V. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.
-
- 94-8035 DAVIS, LEON V. FIRST WORTHING MANAGEMENT
-
- 94-8242 IN RE EURICA CALIFORRNIAA
-
- 94-8248 HILI, CHARLES V. HILI, MARY
-
- 94-8277 ETHERIDGE, CATHERINE M. V. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY
-
- 94-8294 IN RE JOHN SNAVELY
-
- 94-8299 SOLIS, ARTURO V. CIRCLE K CORP., ET AL.
-
- 94-8375 FRUSHER, CECELIA P. V. BASKIN-ROBBINS, ET AL.
-
- 94-8402 ROLAND, GEORGE V. STALDER, RICHARD, ET AL.
-
- 94-8464 IN RE DOROTHY LITZENBERG
-
- 94-8617 IN RE GEORGE R. WILSON
-
- 94-8656 MASON, MICHAEL W., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from Monday, June
-
- 19, 1995, until Wednesday, June 21, 1995, and from
-
- Wednesday, June 21, 1995, until Monday, June 26, 1995.
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-